Sh. Sanjay Kardam v. Hdfc Bank Limited

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11317/2017 SANJAY KARDAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjiv Sagar and Mr Khawaja Siddiqui, Advs.

versus HDFC BANK LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Jagriti Ahuja, Advs HDFC Bank Limited

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 18.12.2017 CM No. 46227/2017(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed off.

W.P.(C) 11317/2017 and CM No. 46226/2017 (stay) The present writ petition assails an order dated 08.12.2017 passed by the learned DRAT, Delhi in Appeal No.435/2017; arising out of SA No.226/2017, DRT-III, Delhi, on the ground that the petitioner has been prejudiced thereby without an opportunity of being heard and, in fact, without even being arrayed as a party; when they are purportedly in possession of the subject premises bearing No.56, Sehgal Motor Market, Kashmere Gate, New Delhi. Notice. Mr Ateev Mathur, Advocate accepts notice and states that the respondent/Bank does not propose to take any action in terms

of the proposed order. The statement made on behalf of the respondent-bank is accepted.

The writ petition along with the pending applications are disposed off accordingly.

Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J DEEPA SHARMA, J DECEMBER 18, 2017 bg