Mayank Pathak & ORS v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

$~19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 141/2018 & Crl. M.A. No. 607/2018 MAYANK PATHAK & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. S. Satranarayana, Adv.

versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR...... Respondents Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Naveen Kumar, P.S. Rani Bagh for respondent no. 1 Mr. Raj Kumar and Mr. Aayushmaan Vatsyayand, Advs. with respondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 12.01.2018 Respondent no.2 Dr. Anisha Sharma present in Court along with her counsel and has been identified by SI Naveen Kumar of police station Rani Bagh. Respondent no. 2 admits having settled the matter with petitioner no. 1 of her own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi on 20th March, 2017. Respondent no. 2 submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has already been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent dated 24th October, 2017 passed by the Family Courts, North-West

District, Rohini, Delhi. Respondent no. 2 says that she has no objection in case FIR is quashed against the petitioner no. 1 and his relatives, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 5.

Keeping in mind the facts and circumstances as detailed above, more particularly, the fact that marriage of petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 has already been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent, in the interest of justice, FIR No.386/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/313/34 IPC registered at Police Station Rani Bagh and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

JANUARY 12, 2018 r.bararia