Ramesh Basoya v. Krishan Gopal

$~45.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. No.587/2015.

RAMESH BASOYA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Arun Kumar Tewari, Adv.

versus KRISHAN GOPAL ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

O R D E R

% 25.09.2017 CM No.35193/2017 (for exemption).

1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2.

The application stands disposed of.

CM No.35192/2017 (of the petitioner under Section 151 CPC). 1.

Extension of time to vacate in pursuance to the undertaking given to this Court on 25th April, 2017 to vacate on or before 30th September, 2017 is sought.

2.

Without the counsel for the respondent appearing and agreeing, no such extension can be granted.

3.

Even otherwise, no reason for extension and particularly at the last minute is given.

4.

Dismissed.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 „pp‟..