← Library
High Court of DelhiARB.P./838/2017

Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Medical Superintendent

2018-03-14Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru2 pages

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ARB.P. 838/2017 SARVESH SECURITY SERVICES PVT.

LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Ms Sneha Singh, Advocate.

versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr Chirayu Jain, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 14.03.2018 1.

Ms Sneha Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner received a letter dated 22.02.2018, whereby the respondent had called upon the petitioner to furnish certain documents. 2.

Mr Ramesh Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the present petition is premature. He drew the attention of this Court to an order dated 25.10.2017 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 9327/2017 captioned Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Medical Superintendent, Babu Jagjivan Ram Memorial Hospital and submitted that in terms of the said order, the respondent was required to take an informed decision, which the respondent would. He stated that the petitioner's grievance survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to institute such proceedings as may be available. However, he further stated that recourse to arbitration would not be available to the petitioner as there was no arbitration agreement between the parties.

3.

Ms Sneha Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

disputes Mr Singh's contention that recourse to arbitration would not be available. She, however, without prejudice to the said contention, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, if need so arise. 4.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. VIBHU BAKHRU, J MARCH 14, 2018 RK