Ramesh Rao v. Bimal Prasad Jain

$~6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 1467/2017 and CM 47468/2017 and 47470/2017 RAMESH RAO ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Minal Sehgal proxy counsel for Mr. Vijay Sansanwal, Advocate versus BIMAL PRASAD JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. C.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the caveator /respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 08.01.2018 CAV. 1126/2017 Since the learned counsel for the caveator has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged.

CM(M) 1467/2017 and CM Nos.47468/2017 and 47470/2017 Ms. Minal Sehgal, proxy counsel on instructions from Mr. Vijay Sansanwal, the counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition as the subject premises has already been vacated and the possession handed over to the opposite party.

The petition and the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

R.K.GAUBA, J JANUARY 08, 2018 yg