Swaran Madan v. Nisha Chaudhary & ORS

$~76 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 90/2018 & CM APPL. 3310/2018 SWARAN MADAN .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Dhruv Madan, Advocate.

versus NISHA CHAUDHARY & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Mr. S.K.

Sagar, Ms.

Ragini Vinaik, Ms.

Thanglunkim, Mr. Gaikhuanlung and Ms. Hridhyaa Singh, Advocates for R-1 & 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 18.03.2026 1.

The parties have arrived at a settlement before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

2.

The Settlement Agreement dated 4th February, 2026 (hereinafter "Settlement Agreement") has been placed on record and the same bears the signatures of all the parties in the appeal.

3.

I have gone through the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find the same to be lawful.

4.

Accordingly, the dispute between the parties arising out of the judgment and decree dated 29th August, 2017 passed by ADJ-04 (South), Saket District Court, New Delhi in CS No. 8773/2016 stands settled in terms of the Settlement Agreement.

RFA 90/2018 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 11:04:56

5.

The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

6.

The Settlement Agreement shall form part of the decree. 7.

In view thereof, the present appeal along with the pending application(s) stands disposed of.

AMIT BANSAL, J MARCH 18, 2026 Rzu RFA 90/2018 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 11:04:56