Sameer Ansari @ Shiv Kumar v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

$-40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2326/2015 SAMEER ANSARI @ SHIV KUMAR Petitioner Through Mr. Siddhartha Singh with Ms. Farzana, Advocates versus STATE (NOT OF DELHI) & ORS Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel(Crl) with Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Mr. Amrit Singh, Mr. Shekhar Budakoti, Mr.

Sanyog Bahadur, Advocates for the State/respondents no.l to 3 along with Inspector Sanjay Sharma and SI Pawan Kumar, P.S. South Rohini.

Mr. Urooj Ahmad Khan, Advocate for respondents no.4 & 5.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

ORDER

% 28.10.2015 Petitioner seeks production of his wife. As per the petition, marriage between the petitioner and Shahnaz Bano was solemnized on 17^*^ September, 2015. Also, as per the petition, Shahnaz Bano is being illegally detained by her parents.

Notice was issued in the matter. Shahnaz Bano and her father are present in Court. We have spoken to Shahnaz Bano in the Chamber. We have also spoken to the petitioner in the Chamber. Shahnaz Bano has declined to join the company of the petitioner. In view of the statement made by her, the petition is not pressed.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed a petition for grant By:AMULYA

of restitution of conjugal rights and he would press the same. Counsel prays that fresh and correct address of respondents no.4 and 5 be provided. Counsel for respondents no.4 and 5 submits that the permanent address of respondents no.4 and 5 has been mentioned in the writ petition, however, in case they are required to be served, they may be served at the address of the Advocate. Counsel for respondents no.4 and 5 submits that they are receiving threatening calls from the petitioner, which fact is disputed by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would abide by the law and shall not approach the respondents except through legal channels. The petition is dismissed as not pressed.

CrI.M.A.15329/2015 Since the petition has been dismissed, the application also stands dismissed.

G.S.SISTANI, J SANGI INGRA^HGAL, J OCTOBER 28, 2015 pst W.P.(CRL) 2326/2015 2/2