Titu v. State

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2365/2015 TITU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Gaurav Bhattacharya, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.Kamna Vohra, A.S.C. for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 29.01.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., Petitioner is seeking furlough for a period of three weeks for searching his younger sister and two daughters. 2.

A perusal of the nominal roll reveals that overall jail conduct of the Petitioner has been unsatisfactory and punishment dated 24th February, 2005, 19th April, 2006, 6th February, 2007, 14th March, 2010 and 19th July, 2015 have been awarded to him.

3.

As per clause 11.2 of Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010, in order to be eligible for release on furlough, the conduct of the convict in prison must have been uniformly good.

4.

In view of the above, no ground for releasing the Petitioner on furlough is made out at this stage. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. PRATIBHA RANI, J.

JANUARY 29, 2016/'pg'