← Library
High Court of DelhiMAT.APP.(F.C.)/42/2019

Neeraj v. Preeti

2023-07-21Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,Neena Bansal Krishna2 pages

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.07.2023 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 42/2019 & CM APPL.6009/2019 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Advocate versus PREETI ..... Respondent Through:

In person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant seeking setting aside of the impugned judgement dated 17.05.2018 passed in HMA No.558555/2016 passed by learned Principle Judge, Family Court, North District, Rohini whereby the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been dismissed. 2.

Respondent appears in person and she has produced her original Aadhar Card issued by Government of India bearing No.439117430294 VID 9194849199218860 for identification and after verifying the same, it is returned to respondent. Copy thereof is taken on record. 3.

Respondent has also produced a copy of order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonipat wherein it is recorded that the MAT.APP.(F.C.) 42/2019 Page 1 of 2 By:ROHIT KUMAR 17:27

respondent has withdrawn the criminal appeal, i.e. CRA-175/2017 filed by her against the appellant-husband.

4.

Respondent submits that she does not want to pursue this appeal and she has no objection if present appeal is allowed. 5.

Accordingly, marriage between appellant and respondent is hereby dissolved.

6.

Present appeal along with pending application stands disposed of. 7.

Decree-sheet be drawn accordingly.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE JULY 21, 2023/rk MAT.APP.(F.C.) 42/2019 Page 2 of 2 By:ROHIT KUMAR 17:27