Shivendu Sharma v. Raj Rani

$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. M.C. 6310/2018, CRL. M.A. Nos.5607/2020 & 7961/2020 SHIVENDU SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Anuj Bhandari, Advocate.

versus RAJ RANI ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

O R D E R

% 22.07.2020 1.

On 22.06.2020, CRL. M.A. Nos. 5607/2020 & 7961/2020 were listed on urgent mentioning, on which date the respondent had appeared on advance notice through the counsel and the matter was adjourned for 20.07.2020 for filing reply.

2.

On the last date of hearing, i.e. 20.07.2020, it was informed by learned counsel for the respondent that the respondent had expired on 17.07.2020 and the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to take instructions in the matter.

3.

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has expired, the present petition does not survive for consideration, as the same has become infructuous. 4.

In view of the fact that the respondent is no more, the present petition

has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as infructuous. Pending applications also stand disposed of. The date already fixed in the matter stands cancelled and need not be listed on the said date. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JULY 22, 2020 'dc'