Asian Hotels (West) Ltd & ORS v. Jindal Photo Investment Ltd & ORS

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM No.5256/2024 in + RFA(OS) 88/2018 ASIAN HOTELS (WEST) LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Through:

Mr Siddharth Agarwal, Ms Divya Bhalla and Mr Anuj Shah, Advs.

versus JINDAL PHOTO INVESTMENT LTD & ORS .... Respondents Through:

Mr Kaustubh Prakash, Ms Hita Sharma, Mr Lavish Sharma and Mr Asher Revi Job, Adv. for R-1 to 3 and 5.

Mr Shivank Diddi, Mr Ajay Bhargava and Mr Aseem Chaturvedi, Advs. for R-6 to 9.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 30.01.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM No.5256/2024 1.

This is an application filed on behalf of the appellants seeking withdrawal of the appeal.

2.

Mr Shivank Diddi, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of respondents 6 to 9, says that he has no objection to the prayer made in the application.

3.

Mr Kaustubh Prakash, counsel who appears on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 and 5, says that while he has no objection to the prayer made in the application, there are certain costs to be recovered and, therefore, some observation should be made to that effect.

RFA(OS) 88/2018 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:35:45

4.

Furthermore, we are informed by the learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsels appearing for the respondents that respondent no. 4 chose not to join the proceedings despite being served. 5.

In our opinion, there is, presently, no impediment in granting the prayer made by the appellants in the above-captioned application. 6.

Accordingly, the prayer made in the application is allowed. 7.

Insofar as the recovery of costs is concerned, no directions can be issued by this court vis-à-vis that aspect of the matter. 7.1 Mr Kaustubh Prakash will be at liberty to take steps concerning the same, as may be permissible in law.

8.

The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. RFA(OS) 88/2018 9.

In view of the order passed in CM No. 5256/2024, nothing further remains to be done in the appeal.

10.

The appeal is, accordingly, closed.

11.

The Registry will dispatch a copy of the order to respondent no. 4 via all modes including e-mail.

12.

The case papers shall stand consigned to record. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J AMIT BANSAL, J JANUARY 30, 2024 aj Click here to check corrigendum, if any RFA(OS) 88/2018 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:35:45