Shri Digamber Jain Mahila Ashram v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13510/2018 SHRI DIGAMBER JAIN MAHILA ASHRAM ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Pavan Duggal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through : Mr.Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Ms.Eshita Baruah and Mr.Aman Bakshi, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

O R D E R

% 15.01.2019 CM APPL No.52674/2018 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 13510/2018 & CM APPL No.52671/2018 The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 30.11.2018 whereby the Estate Officer saying 'the Court is of the opinion that the application moved by the respondent under Order XI Rule 1 CPC and Order VI Rule 17 CPC are not maintainable' had dismissed the applications. Admittedly no reasons were given, hence the impugned order is hereby set aside and it is directed that a speaking order be passed within three weeks from today after hearing the parties afresh. The matter be remanded to the Estate Officer to do the needful. The petition along with pending application stands disposed of

in terms of above.

Copy of this order be given dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

YOGESH KHANNA, J.

JANUARY 15, 2019 VLD