Prabhat Singh v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + PRABHAT SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

None versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC & Mr. Sidharth Sindhu, Advocate for State with SI L. Chauhan

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 18.01.2016 1.

None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., Petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months on the ground of re-connecting social ties with the family and society.

3.

Status report has been filed by the State verifying the address of the Petitioner to be correct.

4.

The Petitioner had made representation to the Respondent/State praying for grant of parole which has been rejected by the Respondent vide order No.F.18/333/2014/HG/4926 dated 1st October, 2015. 5.

The petitioner is seeking parole for maintaining social ties. That as per Parole/Furlough Guidelines 2010, one of the objectives of framing the said

guidelines was 'to protect social ties'. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of parole to the Petitioner to enable him to reconnect social ties.

6.

On behalf of State, it is submitted that appropriate order may be passed keeping in view Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010 issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. 7.

As per nominal roll, the overall jail conduct of the Petitioner as well as jail conduct in last one year is mentioned as 'Satisfactory'. 8.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for grant of parole is allowed to the extent that the Petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:- (i) Since the petitioner is being granted parole for the purpose of reestablishing social ties and he is permanent resident of Village Daduwa, PS Shikarpur, District Bulandshehar, Uttar Pradesh, the Petitioner shall keep the SHO/Duty Officer, P.S. New Ashok Nagar, Delhi informed about his place of residence in Delhi as well as his place of residence in his native town and his contact numbers i.e. mobile, landline or both.

He shall further inform the SHO/Duty Officer, P.S. New Ashok Nagar, Delhi as to the period for which he shall be staying in his native town. (ii) The Petitioner shall report on every Monday at 11 AM to the Duty Officer of the concerned Police Station/Police Post under the jurisdiction of which, the Petitioner shall stay during the period of parole in his native town.

(iii) While submitting the bail bond, he will furnish to the Jail Superintendent the address and the contact numbers of the place where he would reside in Delhi and in his native place i.e. Village Daduwa, PS Shikarpur, District Bulandshehar, Uttar Pradesh, during the period of parole. 9.

It is, however, made clear that on expiry of the parole period, the Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, who shall submit the surrender report to this Court. 10.

Writ Petition stands allowed in the above terms. 11.

The Petitioner be informed through the Jail Superintendent about the order passed.

Order dasti.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

JANUARY 18, 2016 'aky'