← Library
High Court of DelhiO.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/470/2018

Sushila Lakhotia v. Cerelbration City Projects Private Limited & ANR.

2019-02-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Valmiki J. Mehta3 pages

6) $-10 to 15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

O.M.P.m (COMM.) 465/2018 RAMNIWAS SUBHASH CHNADRA LAKHOTIA (HUF) Petitioner Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate with Mr.

Sandeep Bhuraria, Advocate, Ms. Prerna Kohli, Advocate and Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Advocate (M. No.9999646269).

+ CELEBRATION CITY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. No.l (M. No.9560709578).

No.2 (M. No.9811783019).

+ O.M.P.m tCOMM.l 466/2018 L.N. KHETAN, PROPRIETOR OF VRINDAVAN CARPETS Petitioner Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate with Mr.

Sandeep Bhuraria, Advocate, Ms. Prema Kohli, Advocate and Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Advocate (M. No.9999646269).

CELEBRATION CITY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. 4- + O.M.P.m fCOMMT 469/2018 M/S. BLUE WATER ENTERPRISES Petitioner Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate with Mr.

Sandeep Bhuraria, Advocate, Ms. Prema Kohli, Advocate and Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Advocate (M. No.9999646269).

CELEBRATION CITY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. By:AMULYA

Through;

+ O.M.P.m (COMM.) 470/2018 SMT. SUSHILA LAKHOTIA Petitioner Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate with Mr.

Sandeep Bhuraria, Advocate, Ms. Prema Kohli, Advocate and Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Advocate (M. No.9999646269).

CERELBRATION CITY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. + O.M.P.(D (COMM.I 471/2018 SATYA PRIYA LAKHOTIA Petitioner Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate with Mr.

Sandeep Bhuraria, Advocate, Ms. Prema Kohli, Advocate and Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Advocate (M. No.9999646269).

CELEBRATION CITY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED 8c ANR. + O.M.P.m (COMM.) 473/2018 SACHIN MAHAJAN & ANR.

Petitioners Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate with Mr.

Sandeep Bhuraria, Advocate, Ms. Prema Kohli, Advocate and Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Advocate (M. No.9999646269).

£J & CELEBRATION CITY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA

ORDER

V 13.02.2019 1.

These petitions are withdrawn, as prayed, with liberty to file fresh petitions in accordance with law, and it is made clear that this Court has not made any observations nor is it decided as to whether the courts at Delhi have territorial jurisdiction.

2.

The petitions and pending application, if any, are disposed of accordingly.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J FEBRUARY 13, 2019/ib