Roshni v. State
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ROSHNI ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr.Dinesh Malik, Adv.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:
Ms.Nandita Rao, A.S.C. for the State with Neha Dhir, Adv. with SI Abhijeet Singh, PS Krishna Nagar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R
% 11.03.2016 1.
The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner from jail seeking parole for a period of three months on the ground to take care of her husband who is a sugar patient and not well and to re-connect social ties with her family and society.
2.
Notice. Learned ASC accepts notice on behalf of State. 3.
Heard. Status report has also been filed by the State. 4.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that as per Parole/Furlough Guidelines 2010, one of the objectives of framing the said guidelines was 'to protect social ties'. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of parole to the Petitioner to enable her to reconnect social ties with her family and society.
5.
Learned ASC for the State submits that address of the Petitioner has
been verified and appropriate order may be passed keeping in view the Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010 issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.
6.
As per nominal roll, the overall jail conduct of the Petitioner as well as jail conduct in last one year is mentioned as 'Satisfactory'. 7.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for grant of parole is allowed to the extent that the Petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of her release, on her furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:- (i) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall report to the Duty Officer, P.S. Krishna Nagar, Delhi on every Monday at 10 AM. (ii) The Petitioner shall keep the SHO, P.S. Krishna Nagar, Delhi informed about her place of residence in Delhi and her contact numbers i.e. mobile, landline or both. It would be open to the concerned SHO to verify the address and the contact numbers and to seek cancellation of parole in case it is found to be incorrect.
(iii) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall remain in the limits of Delhi.
(iv) The petitioner shall not try to contact the witnesses in any manner whatsoever.
(iv) While submitting the bail bond, she will furnish to the Jail Superintendent the address of the place where she would reside in Delhi during the period of parole as well as the contact numbers. 8.
It is, however, made clear that on expiry of the parole period, the
Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, who shall submit the surrender report to this Court. 9.
Writ Petition stands allowed in the above terms.
10. The Petitioner be informed through the Jail Superintendent about the order passed.
Order dasti.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
MARCH 11, 2016 'hkaur'