Riyazuddin v. State

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2541/2015 RIYAZUDDIN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate.

(DHCLSC) versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with SI Sita Ram, PS Sarita Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 12.01.2016 1.

By filing the present petition, the petitioner is praying for grant of parole for a period of three months on the ground of arranging funds for the treatment of his mother and also for re-establishing social ties. 2.

Status report has been filed by the State.

3.

Nominal roll of the petitioner has also been received. In Column No.18 of the nominal roll i.e. 'Details of interim bail/parole/furlough availed', it is mentioned that the petitioner has been released on 30 days parole w.e.f. 22.12.2015 to 22.01.2016 by order of this Court dated 07.12.2015.

4.

In the given circumstances, the present petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for having become infructuous.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

JANUARY 12, 2016/'st'