Tajender Singh v. State

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2569/2015 TAJENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. R.S.Kundu, A.S.C. for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 19.01.2016 1.

None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking furlough for a period of three weeks.

3.

Perusal of the record reveals that the prayer of the petitioner for grant of furlough has been rejected by the competent authority on the ground that the convicts under NDPS Act are not entitled for remissions as per Section 32A of NDPS Act, whereas furlough is a kind of remission granted to convicts and even the present petitioner has not earned any Annual Good Conduct Remission, as required under Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010. 4.

In the given circumstances, the present petition is dismissed. PRATIBHA RANI, J.

JANUARY 19, 2016 'st'