Saurav @ Golu v. State

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2615/2015 SAURAV @ GOLU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv.

with SI Manohar Lal PS Rajouri Garden

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 13.01.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., Petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months on the ground of filing SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

2.

A perusal of the nominal roll reveals that overall jail conduct of the Petitioner has been unsatisfactory and punishment dated 9th July, 2014, 14th July, 2014 and 13th July, 2015 have been awarded to him. 3.

As per clause 11.2 of Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010, in order to be eligible for release on parole, the conduct of the convict in prison must have been uniformly good.

4.

In view of the above, no ground for release of the Petitioner on parole is made out at this stage. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. PRATIBHA RANI, J.

JANUARY 13, 2016/'pg'