Krishnapal Singh v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

$~15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3972/2018 KRISHNAPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Archna Sharma and Mr. Divyanshu Swasawat, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for State with SI Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Safdarjung Enclave

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 31.12.2018 The writ petition under Article 226 read with Article 21 of the Constitution of India seeks protection of life and property from Mr. Rajesh and Mr. Pramod Kumar.

On 13.12.2018, Petitioner made a complaint to SHO, P.S. Safdarjung Enclave reporting the incident of receiving threat calls and requested for appropriate directions.

Today, learned ASC for State has handed over the copy of NCR registered under Section 155 Cr.PC for offence under Section 506 of IPC on the basis of the aforesaid complaint. The same is taken on record. She further states that the mobile number of SHO, P.S. Safdarjung Enclave, Beat Constable and other concerned officer have been provided to the petitioner and he has been assured that he would not receive any further threat calls. Petitioner can nonetheless contact any of the concerned officers in case he receives any further threatening calls.

Learned counsel further assures that Respondents will take all necessary steps that are necessary to ensure security of the Petitioner. For the present, Petitioner is satisfied with the response and the steps taken by the Respondents. Accordingly no further direction is required to be passed and the petition is disposed of in the above terms. SANJEEV NARULA (VACATION JUDGE) DECEMBER 31, 2018 savita