Anita Kumari v. Central Infromation Commission & ORS

$-1.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ LPA 894/2015 ANITA KUMARI Appellant Through:

MsXatika Chaudhaiy, Adv.

for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv.

Versus

CENTRAL INFROMATION COMMISSION & ORS Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

ORDER

% 05.01.2016 C.M.No.30224/2015 (delay in refilins) In view of the facts and circumstances explained in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned and the application is disposed of. LPANo.894/2015 1.

The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 9252/2015 is the appellant before us.

The said writ petition was filed by the appellant herein with a prayer to quash the order dated 31.03.2014 whereby the Central Information Commission (CIC) dismissed her Second Appeal preferred under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

2.

We have heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. It is evident from the material available on record that the husband of the writ petitioner/ appellant herein had sought the very same information relating to the selection of candidates of general category for appointment of Assistant Commissioner (Grade-II) in the Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization By:AMULYA

and the Second Appeal preferred by him was disposed of by order dated 06.01.2009. Hence, the learned Single Judge was justified in declining to interfere with the order of CIC. As rightly held by the learned Single Judge, once the order on the RTI query of the husband of the appellant herein had attained finality, she cannot be permitted to re-agitate the issue. 3.

We do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the order under appeal and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. <• CHIEF JUSTICE JAYANTNATH,J JANUARY 05,2016 'anb'