Surendar Kaur v. Union Of India And ORS

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10607/2015 SURENDAR KAUR ..... Petitioner Through None.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI.

Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 18.07.2018 None is present on behalf of the petitioner. None was present on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing as well. As per the counter affidavit filed by the LAC, possession stands taken on 21.12.1970 and compensation stands paid. Para 5 of the counter affidavit filed by the LAC reads as under :

"5.

That the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed as the actual vacant physical possession of the subject land was duly taken on 21.12.1970 on the spot by preparing possession proceedings and handed over to the requisition agency on the spot. The compensation of Rs.23736/- was paid to Lal Singh S/o Jaimal Singh and Ujagar Singh S/o Dayal Singh and Labh Singh S/o Lal Singh on 12.10.1970 as per Naksha Muntazamin."

At this stage, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, proxy counsel on behalf of the retained counsel has appeared and submits that he is not aware of the facts of the present case.

In view of the stand taken by the LAC in the counter affidavit and in the absence of any submission made on behalf of the petitioner, we find no merit in the present writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. G.S.SISTANI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J JULY 18, 2018 ck/