Puneet Agarwal v. Sonal Agarwal @ Sona Bajoria

$~1 &2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAT.APP.IF.C.) 6/2015 & CM No. 1104/2015 SONAL AGARWAL Appellant Through : Mr. V.K. Jain, Advocate, versus PUNEET AGARWAL Respondent Through : Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate.

+ MAT.APP.(F.C.1148/2015 CM Nos. 30368-69/2015 PUNEET AGARWAL Appellant Through : Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate, versus SONAL AGARWAL @ SONA BAJORIA Respondent Through : Mr. V.K. Jain, jAdvoeate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE 1.S.MEHTA

ORDER

% 13.05.2016 1.

The parties are present in Court with their respective counsels. A Settlement Agreement dated 11May, 2016 has been received in original from SAMADHAN - Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. 2.

Both the parties have undertaken that they shall abide by the terms of the settlement and ensure foil working out of terms and conditions set out therein. A prayer is made before us that these appeals be disposed of on the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 1 k*" May, 2016 (Exh. 'CP). 3.

Separate statements of Ms.Sonal Agarwal and Mr.Puneet Agarwal By:AMULYA

th have been reeorded in support of settlement agreement dated 11 May, 2016 (Exh. 'Cl') which appears to be voluntary and without any undue pressure and coercion. The parties have requested that the settlement agreement dated 11"" May, 2016 (Exh. 'Cl') be accepted and appeals be disposed of in terms thereof. They have given their undertakings to remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement which have been set out in clause (i) to (xviii) of the agreement Exh. 'Cl'.

4.

The settlement agreement Exh. 'Cl' appears to be voluntarily entered into by the parties without any coercion and pressure. There is no legal impediment for taking the same on record. The settlement appears to be in the welfare and best interest of the minor child of the parties. Master Naman. 5.

In view of the above, we direct as follows (i) The Settlement Agreement dated ll"^ May, 2016 (Exh.'CT) is accepted and taken on record.

(ii) The undertakings given by the parties in their respective statements are also accepted and the parties shall remain bound by the terms thereof. Parties shall ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement.

(iii) In case of breach, apart from all other legal consequences, the parties shall render themselves liable for appropriate proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act as well. (iv) In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, all the pending applications in these appeal do not survive for consideration and are disposed of as such.

(v) The present appeals as well as all the pending applications are disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 11^*" May, 2016 (Exh.'CT).

Dasti mXAMITJAL,!

TA, J MAY 13, 2016/j