Shakti Singh Rana v. Vinay Kumar Mahajan

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 174/2016 SHAKTI SINGH RANA ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus VINAY KUMAR MAHAJAN ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Shekhar Nanavaty, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 16.05.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 13755/2018 (U/O XXII R-10 & 22 R-3) 1.

In view of circumstances mentioned in last order and also because for few dates none has been appearing for petitioner, coupled with the fact that according to learned counsel, possession of the subject premises already stands restored to the landlord, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application, with liberty to move appropriate application in case situation so arises. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

CM APPL. 10041/2016 (delay in re-filing), CM APPL. 45204/2016 (additional facts) and RC.REV. 174/2016 2.

Be awaited for petitioner.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 16, 2024/ry The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 05:00:43

3.

Even in this call in post-lunch session, none appears on behalf of petitioner. After 12.12.2022 none has been appearing on behalf of petitioner. The petition as well as pending applications are dismissed in default. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 16, 2024/rk Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 05:00:43