Deepak Vohra v. East Delhi Municipal Corpn. & ORS
$~59, 61, 62, 67, 68, 77, 79, 80, 100, 129, 190, 225, 227, 229, 235, 236, 237, 271, 283, 293, 298, 317, 318, 329, 332, 337, 349, 355, 358, 363, 364, 371, 372, 373, 377, 380, 388, 395, 401, 413, 417, 419, 420, 421, 423, 425, 430, 469, 471, 475, 477, 479, 571.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9439/2017 & CM No.38418/2017 ATUL KHOSLA & ANR.
..... Petitioners
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents ALONG WITH W.P.(C) 470/2018 & CM No.2020/2018; W.P.(C).693/2018 & CM No.2995/2018 & 10092/2018; W.P.(C).10875/2017 & CM No.44515/2017; W.P.(C).749/2018 & CM No.3133;
W.P.(C).11524/2017 & CM No.46964/2017; W.P.(C).208/2018 & CM Nos.845/2018, 10094/2018; W.P.(C).469/2018 & CM No.2018/2018; W.P.(C).2259/2018 & CM No.9343/2018;
W.P.(C).3071/2018 & CM No.12240/2018;
W.P.(C).4403/2018 & CM No.17114/2018; W.P.(C).6120/2018 & CM No.23747/2018;
W.P.(C).6122/2018 & CM No.23751/2018;
W.P.(C).6186/2018 & CM No.23894/2018; W.P.(C).6214/2018 & CM No.23964/2018;
W.P.(C).6251/2018 & CM No.24128/2018;
W.P.(C).6255/2018 & CM No.24134/2018; W.P.(C).7072/2018 & CM No.26894/2018;
W.P.(C).7265/2018 & CM No.27715/2018;
W.P.(C).7365/2018 & CM No.28166/2018; W.P.(C).7370/2018 & CM No.28175/2018;
W.P.(C).7605/2018 & CM Nos.29083-84/2018;
W.P.(C).7606/2018 & CM No.29089-29090/2018; W.P.(C).7677/2018 & CM No.29416/2018; W.P.(C).7824/2018 & CM No.29958/2018; W.P.(C). 7860/2018 & CM No.30159/2018; W.P.(C).8028/2018; W.P.(C).8084/2018 & CM No.30957/2018; W.P.(C).8110/2018 & CM No.31102/2018; W.P.(C).8283/2018 & CM No.31766/2018; W.P.(C).8285/2018 & CM No.31771/2018;
W.P.(C).8375/2018 & CM No.32137/2018;
W.P.(C).8381/2018;
W.P.(C).8390/2018 & CM No.32227/2018;
W.P.(C).8517/2018 & CM No.32758/2018; W.P.(C).8557/2018 & CM No.32872/2018;
W.P.(C).8599/2018 & CM No.33035/2018;
W.P.(C).8759/2018 & CM Nos.33644-45/2018; W.P.(C).8840/2018 & CM No.33995/2018;
W.P.(C).9024/2018 & CM No.34708/2018;
W.P.(C).9028/2018 & CM No.34716/2018; W.P.(C).9037/2018 & CM No.34730/2018;
W.P.(C).9111/2018 & CM No.35165/2018;
W.P.(C).9112/2018 & CM No.35169/2018; W.P.(C).9137/2018 & CM No.35231/201/8;
W.P.(C).9155/2018 & CM No.35306/2018;
W.P.(C).9356/2018 & CM No.36271/2018;; W.P.(C).10167/2018 & CM No.39636/2018;
W.P.(C).10169/2018 & C.Ms.
No.39678-79/2018, 39732/2018;
W.P.(C).10179/2018 & CM No.39657/2018;
W.P.(C).10207/2018 & CM No.39815/2018; and W.P.(C).10209/2018 & C.M. No.39822/2018, W.P.(C).11206/2018 & CM No.43540/2018; Advocates who appeared in the matters:
For Petitioners:
Mr.Vivek Kohli, Adv. with Mr.Sandeep Bhuraria, Ms.Anubha Singh Abhyankar, Ms.Neetika Bajaj, Advs. for the petitioner in Item No.59. Mr. Muhammad Ali Khan, Adv. for Petitioner in Items No.61, 62, 79, 80, Mr. Amish Tandon, Adv. with Mr.Varun Phogat, Ms.Swati Koshal, Advs. for appellant/petitioner in Items No.329.
Mr. Azaz Ahmad, Advocate for petitioner in Items No.129. Mr. S.P. Chawla, Adv. for Petitioner in Item No. 190 Mr. Ayush, Adv. in Item No.329 Mr. Karun Grover, Adv. in Item No.349 Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr.Ritu Khurana, Advs. in Item No.364, 371, 373, 377, 380, 388, 395, 398, 401.
Mr. G.P. Madaan, Mr. Ishaan Madaan , Ms. Payal Juneja and Mr. Sahil Tanwar, Advocates for petitioners in Items No. 100, 235, 229. Mr. S.P. Singh Chawla, Advocate for petitioner in Item No. 227. Mr. A.K. Pandey & Mr. Ramesh Chandra, Advocates for Petitioner in Items No. 236, 237.
Ms. Sonika Sharma, Adv. for petitioner in Item No.271. Mr. Himanshu Harbola and Mr. Ketan Madan, Advocates for petitioner in Items No. 293, 298, 395.
Mr.Gaurav Varma, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Das, Adv. for the petitioner in Items No.317, 571.
Mr. Ayush, Adv. in Item No.329.
Mr.Kumar Shashank, Adv. with Ms.Rukhmini Bobde, Mr.Manik Sethi, Advs. for the petitioner in Item No.332.
Mr. Karun Grover, Adv. in Item No.349.
Mr. Praveen K. Mittal, Adv. For petitioner in Item No.358. Mr.Anuj Mirdha, Adv. with Ms.Ansu Bhanot, Mr.Tushar Gupta, Advs. for
the petitioner in Item No.363.
Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Prateek Goel and Ms. Ritu Khurana, Advocates for petitioners in Items No. 364, 371, 373, 377, 380, 388, 398, 401, 419, 421, 423, 425, 436, 430.
Mr. Varun Kashyap, Adv. in Item No.372.
Mr.Rahul Ahuja, Mr.Sourabh Kalia, Advs. in Item Nos. 411. Mr.B.K.Mishra, Adv. for the petitioner in Items No.417. Mr. Prachi Johri, Adv. for petitioner in Item No. 420 Mr.Naresh Kumar Bansal, Adv. with Mr.Alok Sinha, Adv. for petitioner in Item No.469.
Mr.Naresh Kumar Bansal, Adv. with Mr.Alok Sinha, Adv. for petitioner in Item No. 471, 475, 477, 479.
For Respondents:
Mrs. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mrs. Bharathi Raju CGSC for Respondent No. 1 & 2 (UOI).
Mrs.
Suparna Srivastava and Ms.
Sanjna Dua, Advocates for Respondent/UOI in Items No. 59.
Mr. Ashim Sood , CGSC and Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocates for Respondents in Items No. 62, 293, 298.
Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms.Akanksha Mishra, Adv. in Item No.67.
Ms. Ruchi Jain, Adv. for UOI in Item No.68.
Mr. P.S. Singh, Senior Penal Counsel for respondent/ UOI with Ms.Annu Singh and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocates in Items No. 77 Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. CGSC for UOI in items No.100, 388. Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Adv. for CGSC UOI with Mr. Suraj Kumar and Mr. Shivam Wadhwa, Advocates in Item No. 190, 329, 373. Mr. Rahul Sharma & Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Advocates for R-1 & 2 in Item No. 225, 227 Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Senior Advocate for Respondents in Items No.229, 235.
Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. CGSC for UOI in items No. 318,337. Mr.Pratyush Miglani, Adv. for UOI/ROC in Item Nos.236, 237, 271, 420 Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC for R1 & R2 in Item No. 372 Mr. Mahender Kumar Bhardwaj with Ms. Vinita Kumari Ashutosh, Advs. for UOI in Item Nos.317, 332, 349, 363, 421.
Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC for R1 & R2 in Item No.372.
Mr. Sandeep Mahapatra, Adv. for R-1 & 2 in Item Nos.377, 413 Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Kashish Bajaj, Adv. for R-1 & 2 in Item Nos. 395.
Mr. Piyush Gaur, Adv. for respondents in Item No. 401.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 23.10.2018 The issue involved in these cases pertains to action taken by the Registrar of Companies situated outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court and under identical situations, on account of lack of territorial jurisdiction we had refused to interfere into such matters earlier.
Accordingly, these petitions are also dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate petitions before the Courts having territorial jurisdiction over the matter.
All pending applications shall also stand disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO, J OCTOBER 23, 2018 'anb'