Veena Kandhari v. Dr Puneet Kumar Goel

1/ $--8 to 11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CONT.CAS(C) 918/2015 SATPAL SINGH Petitioner Through:

Mr., Dhirendra Yadav, Mr. Vijay, Mr.Manohar Nagar, Advs.

versus DR PUNEET KUMAR GOEL Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Mr. Kunal Gosain, Advs. for SDMC.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 919/2015 SAVITRI DEVI TANEJA Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dhirendra Yadav, Mr. Vijay, Mr.Manohar Nagar, Advs.

versus DR PUNEET KUMAR GOEL Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Mr. Kunal Gosain, Advs. for SDMC.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 920/2015 VEENA KANDHARI Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dhirendra Yadav, Mr. Vijay, Mr.Manohar Nagar, Advs.

versus DR PUNEET KUMAR GOEL Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Mr. Kunal Gosain, Advs. for SDMC.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 926/2015 RAJVIR SINGH Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dhirendra Yadav, Mr. Vijay, Mr.Manohar Nagar, Advs.

By:AMULYA

5-^ versus DR PXJNEET KUMAR GOEL Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Mr. Kunal Gosain, Advs. for SDMC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

ORDER

% 14.01.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the shops in question have been de-sealed by the competent authority on 11 December, 2015.

Compliance report has been filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not press these petitions in view of the de-sealing of the shops in question. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

J.R. MIDHA, J.

JANUARY 14, 2016 dk