Rohtash And Another v. Deputy Commissioner And Others

$~21 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 3421/2015 & I.A.No.25091/2015 ROHTASH AND ANOTHER ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Tanmay Nagar, Advocate.

versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through Mr.D.Rajeshwar Rao with Mr.Abhinav Srivastava, Advocates for D-1, 2 & 4 with Mr.Amjad Tak, DC, South Delhi and Mr.Ram Chandra Srinagare, SDM Saket.

+ CS(OS) 3423/2015 & I.A.No.25097/2015 NARESH AND OTHERS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Tanmay Nagar, Advocate.

versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through Mr.D.Rajeshwar Rao with Mr.Abhinav Srivastava, Advocates for D-1, 2 & 4 with Mr.Amjad Tak, DC, South Delhi and Mr.Ram Chandra Srinagare, SDM Saket.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 04.12.2017 On 15th November, 2017, this Court had passed the following order:-

"The learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs would be satisfied in the event the defendants make a statement that the plaintiffs shall be dispossessed only in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the defendants prays for some time to take instructions.

In the interest of justice, renotify on 04th December, 2017 at 2.30 p.m. for directions.

The Deputy Commissioner (South) is directed to be personally present in court on the next date of hearing." In pursuance to the aforesaid order, Mr.Amjad Tak, Deputy Commissioner, South Delhi is personally present in Court. He undertakes that the plaintiffs shall be dispossessed only in accordance with law.

The undertaking and statement made by Mr.Amjad Tak is accepted by this Court and the defendants are held bound by the same.

In view thereof, the present suits are decreed in accordance with the statements of learned counsel for plaintiffs and defendants. However, it is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

Registry is directed to issue to the plaintiffs the certificates authorizing them to receive back from the Collector the half amount of Court fee paid by them in their respective suits. Order dasti.

MANMOHAN, J

DECEMBER 04, 2017 KA