← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/11378/2015

Suresh Kumar Shukla v. Union Of India & ANR

2015-12-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice G.S.Sistani,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal3 pages

7$~94 - 99-102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment : 8th December, 2015 + W.P.(C) 11371/2015, CM APPL. No. 29936/2015 VISHWANATH PRATAP SINGH CHAUHA AND ORS.

..... Petitioners versus UOI AND ANR.

..... Respondents $-95 + W.P.(C) 11372/2015, CM APPL. No. 29937/2015 SEEMA SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents $-96 + W.P.(C) 11374/2015, CM APPL. No. 29939/2015 RAIYAZ ALI ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents $-99 + W.P.(C) 11377/2015, CM APPL. No. 29940/2015 RUSHIKESH RAMCHANDRA DUDHAT ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents $-100 + W.P.(C) 11378/2015 CM APPL. No. 29941/2015 SURESH KUMAR SHUKLA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents

$-101 + W.P.(C) 11379/2015 CM APPL. No. 29942/2015 NARENDRA PAL & ANR.

..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents $-102 + W.P.(C) 11380/2015, CM APPL. No. 29943/2015 ARVIND KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ANR.

..... Respondent Appearance Mr. Manish Kumar Saran and Mr. Avnish Kumar, Advocates for petitioners (Item Nos. 94 to 96, 99 and 100-102) Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Rishi Kapoor and Mr. Srikant Misra, GP for UOI. (Item Nos. 94 to 96 and 99 to 102).

Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Ms. Kritika, Advocates for UPSC (Item No. 94 to 96 and 99 to 102) Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates for respondent No. 1 (Item No. 94 and 102) Mr. Sidharth Khatana, Advocate, GP for UOI (Item Nos. 94 and 102)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J. (ORAL) Challenge in these writ petitions being W. P. (C) Nos. 11371/2015, 11372/2015, 11374/2015, 11378/2015, 11379/2015 and 11380/2015, is to the order dated 27.10.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and order dated 06.11.2015 in W. P. (C) No. 11377/2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The Tribunal had disposed of the OAs filed by the petitioner with following directions :

"In the totality of the facts and circumstances, the OAs are disposed of with direction to DOP&T to examine whether even such candidates who were eligible to take CSE 2011 or had taken 2012 or 2013 or 2014 examination should also be given another chance to take Civil Services Exam with changed pattern in 2015 when the CSAT is made qualifying examination. Such decision may be taken by DOP&T within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No Costs.

Aggrieved by the aforesaid directions, the present writ petitions have been filed.

Mr. Naresh Kaushik, learned counsel appearing for UPSC has handed over a copy of order dated 02.12.2015 passed by the DoPT in compliance with the directions of the Tribunal. By a speaking order, the DoPT has declined the request of the petitioners and has rendered reasons for the same. Copy of the order has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners, who seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petitions with leave to file the fresh petitions in accordance with law.

Accordingly, these writ petitions along with all pending applications are disposed of. Leave granted, as prayed.

Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Master. G.S.SISTANI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J DECEMBER 08, 2015 / gr