Banwari Lal v. State

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2855/2015 BANWARI LAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Saurabh Kansal & Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.Srilina Roy, Advocate for Ms.Nandita Rao, A.S.C. for the State with ASI Rajender Singh PS Geeta Colony

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 01.04.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., petitioner is praying for quashing of the order dated 19th October, 2015 passed by the respondent and seeking grant of furlough for a period of two weeks.

2.

A perusal of the nominal roll of the petitioner reveals that his overall jail conduct as well as jail conduct during last one year was unsatisfactory due to recovery of prohibited articles and punishment dated 22nd August, 2015.

5.

As per clause 11.2 of Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010, in order to be eligible for release on furlough, the conduct of the convict in prison must have been uniformly good.

6.

In view of the above, no ground for release of the Petitioner on furlough is made out at this stage. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. 7.

Petitioner be informed through the concerned Jail Superintendent about the orders passed.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

APRIL 01, 2016/'pg'