Atul Bhuchar v. State & ANR

$~23 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 5012/2015 ATUL BHUCHAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria, Mr.

Rajesh Chugh, Advocates versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. K.R. Chawla, Mr. Kamal Behl and Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocates for respondent No. 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 12.01.2016 During the course of hearing of the present petition, it is observed that the purpose of filing the present petition is to transfer the criminal complaint from one court of the Magistrate to other court of the Magistrate in other session's division, in view of Section 142A of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

At this stage, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner, on instructions, submits that the present petition may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to move an application under Section 407 of Cr. PC.

In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

It is made clear that passing of the any order by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate or the Revisional Court or the filing of the present petition shall not come in the way while considering the application under Section 407 of Cr. PC., filed by the petitioner. With aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of. P.S.TEJI, J JANUARY 12, 2015 pkb