High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/11905/2015

Union Of India & ORS v. Nauwat

2015-12-21Hon'Ble Mr. Justice G.S.Sistani,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal2 pages

$--31,32, & 34 to 37 IN IHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11873/2015 + W.P.(C) 11874/2015 + W.P.(C) 11904/2015 + , W.P.(C) 11905/2015 + W.P.(C) 11906/2015 + W.P.(C) 11907/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Petitioners Through : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, Standing counsel for the Railways/petitioners.

versus DFIOOM SINGIi ANI9 ANR Respondents SHY AM PYAITE YADAV Respondent GI-IANSHYAM SINGFI .

Respondent NAUWAT Respondent MUNNILAI. AND ORS Respondents ASHOK KUMAR AND ANR Respondents Hirough

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGH A DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 21.12.2015 CM APPL. 31570/2015 IN W.P.ICI 11873/2015 CM APFL. 31572/2015 IN W.P.ICI 11874/2015 CM APPL. 31614/2015 IN W.PJCI 11904/2015 CM APPL. 31616/2015 IN W.P.(C) 11905/2015 CM APPL. 31618/2015 IN W.P.(C) 11906/2015 CM APPL. 31620/2015 IN W.F.fCI 11907/2015

1. Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of. .

W.P.ICINOS. 11873/2015. 11874/2015, 11904/2015, 11905/2015, 11906/2015 and 11907/2015 D.

Challenge in these writ petitions is to the order dated 16.1.2015 (in W.P.(C) 11873/2015, W.P.(C) 11904/2015, W.P.(C) 11905/2015, By:AMULYA

r W.P.(C) 11906/2015 and W.P.(C) 11907/2015) and the order dated 25.5.2015 (in W.P.(C) 11874/2015) passed by Central Administrative Tribunal.

4. Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that in identical matters, this court on 11.12.2015 has allowed the writ petitions and remanded the matter back to the Central Administrative Tribunal for hearing on merits. Mr.Singh further submits that no notice is required in thdse writ petitions as the respondents in these writ petition had also filed independent writ petitions in a batch of matters of which the lead matter is being- W.P.(C)No.l 1155/2015 titled as Siiraj Prakash & Anr. V. Union ofIndia & Ors., assailing the same very order.

5. Accordingly, all these writ petitions are allowed and the impugned orders passed by the Tribunal are quashed for the detailed reasons, as stated in the batch of matters mentioned above.

CM APPL. 31569/2015 (STAY) IN W.P.(0 11873/2015 CM APPL. 31571/2015 (STAY) IN W.P.(C) 11874/2015 CM APPL. 31613/2015 (STAY) iN W.P.(C) 11904/2015 CM APPL. 31615/2015 (STAY) IN W.P.(C) 11905/2015 CM APPL. 31617/2015 (STAY) IN W.P.rCl 11906/2015 CM APPL. 31619/2015 (STAY) IN W.P.(C) 11907/2015 ^

6. Applications stand disposed of in view of the order passed in the writ petitions.

G.S.SISTANI, J GAI NG SANGIT DECEMBER 21, 2015 msr WP.(C)NOS. 11S73/2015,11874/2^35,11904/2015,11905/2015,11906/2015 and 11907/2015 2/2 I b