Rahul Mahajan & ANR v. The State & ANR

$~54 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 109/2016 RAHUL MAHAJAN & ANR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SubInspector Des Raj, Police Station Vikaspuri, Delhi

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 14.07.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he has settled the matter with respondent No.2 and since the offences mentioned in the FIR are compoundable one, he does not wish to press the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to move an appropriate application for compounding the offence before the Trial Court.

In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Dasti.

P.S.TEJI, J JULY 14, 2016 pkb