Om Prakash Rawat v. Union Of India & ANR

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11807/2015 OM PRAKASH RAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: : Mr. Prakash Deep, proxy counsel for Mr. Amit Attri, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Gautam with Dr. G.L. Bhatia, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 18.02.2016 1.

This order is in continuation of the order dated 18.1.2016, on which date, counsel for the petitioner had raised a grievance that the respondents had not furnished all the relevant documents to enable the petitioner to file an appeal against the dismissal order dated 22.3.2006 issued by the respondent No.2. In response, counsel for the respondents had assured the Court that the relevant documents shall be furnished to the petitioner within three weeks, and the case was adjourned to await compliance.

2.

Today, counsel for the respondents states that compliances have been made and the relevant documents have been furnished to the petitioner, through counsel, under cover of letter dated 28.1.2016, W.P.(C) 11807/2015 Page 1 of 2

which was duly received by the other side on 29.1.2016. He hands over the proof of receipt of the relevant documents, which is taken on record.

3.

In view of the fact that the petitioner has been furnished all the relevant documents, the present petition is disposed of, with liberty granted to him to file a substantive representation before the competent authority against the dismissal order dated 22.3.2006. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J FEBRUARY 18, 2016 sk/rkb W.P.(C) 11807/2015 Page 2 of 2