← Library
High Court of DelhiCONT.CAS(C)/969/2015

Vijai Singh v. Rajiv Mehrishi & ORS

2016-10-03Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manmohan2 pages

#2, 3 & $~ *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

2.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 969/2015 Petitioner Mr. Manu Padalia, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate VIJAI SINGH Through versus Respondents Ms. Barkha Babbar with Ms. Dipanjali Tyagi, and Mr. S.S.

Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF Advocates for UOI.

RAJIV MEHRISHI & ORS Through AND 3.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 975/2015 Petitioner Mr. Manu Padalia, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate DHARAMBIR YADAV Through versus RAJIV MEHRISHI & ORS Through Respondents Ms. Barkha Babbar with Ms. Dipanjali Tyagi, and Mr. S.S.

Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF Advocates for UOI.

AND Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

28.

CONT.CAS(C) 683/2015 Petitioner Mr. Manu Padalia, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate SHISHRAM Through versus L C GOYAL & ORS Through Respondents Mr. K.K. Jha, Sr. Panel Govt.

Counsel with Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF Advocates for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

ORDER

03.10.2016 % In view of the stay orders having been passed by the Supreme Court in SLPs filed by the respondents, learned counsel for petitioners does not wish to press the present petitions at this stage. Consequently, present contempt petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings after the SLPs filed by the respondents are disposed of.

MANMOHAN, J OCTOBER 03, 2016 m