High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/441/2016

Jia Lal And ANR v. Union Of India

2016-05-04Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V.P.Vaish1 pages

$~20 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 441/2016 JIA LAL AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Subodh Kumar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. J.K. Singh, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH

O R D E R

% 04.05.2016 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondent to complete the employment process and provide employment to petitioner No.2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner No.1 was employed with respondent. The respondent issued a notification with regard to the Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff Scheme (LARSGESS). Petitioner No.1 opted for the same and moved an application for VRS.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

V.P.VAISH, J MAY 04, 2016/b b