← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2984/2015

Satish v. State

2015-12-16Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

$~56 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2984/2015 SATISH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dinesh Malik, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Avninder Singh, ASC with Mr.Shiven Varma, Adv.

SI Dinesh Dahiya, P.S. Sultanpuri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

O R D E R

% 16.12.2015 The petitioner questions the order dated 20.11.2015 passed by the competent authority whereby the prayer of the petitioner for being released on parole for reconnecting social ties with family and friends has been rejected. Adverse police report is stated to be reason for not acceding to the request of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he was slapped with life imprisonment by the Trial Court but on appeal, the sentence was reduced to seven years by the High Court of Delhi. It is further been stated that the petitioner has remained in jail for about six years and if the remission period earned is to be counted, barely six months are left for completing the entire sentence.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that relevant entries in the nominal roll shows that the overall conduct of the petitioner in jail has been satisfactory.

Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to release the petitioner on parole for a period of 30 days to be counted from the date of his release on parole.

Let the petitioner be released on parole for a period of 30 days from the date of his release subject to the petitioner furnishing a bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, subject to the following conditions:- a) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities on or before the expiry of the said period of parole. b) The petitioner shall not engage himself in any unlawful activity. c) If the petitioner is required to go out of the territory of Delhi, he would intimate about his visit to the SHO of the concerned police station.

d) He shall furnish his mobile telephone number and the mobile telephone number of the surety to the SHO of the concerned police station so that in case of necessity he could be tracked and his whereabouts could be ascertained.

In case, the petitioner flouts any one of the conditions, an application could be moved by the SHO for cancellation of his parole and for taking of the coercive steps for securing his attendance. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of the concerned Jail for information and compliance. ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J DECEMBER 16, 2015/ns