Dinesh Chaudhary v. Vandana Shokeen & ANR
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 63/2016 DINESH CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Ahlawat, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus VANDANA SHOKEEN & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pushkar Sood, Advocate with Mr. Satya Prakash Singh and Ms. Akshita Chhatwal, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
% 17.01.2017 Learned counsel for petitioner states that in view of the disposal of Cont.Cas(C)254/2015, present petition also stands satisfied. In view thereof, present contempt petition is disposed of as satisfied. It is clarified that there is no restraint/embargo on the petitioner-Mr. Dinesh Chaudhary from travelling abroad.
Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Director (Immigrations) East Block-VIII, Level-V, Sector-1, R.K. Puram, New Delhi. MANMOHAN, J JANUARY 17, 2017 js