Dr. Ankit Singhai And ANR v. Union Public Service Commission And ANR

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 248/2016 DR. ANKIT SINGHAI AND ANR ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Neha Rathi, Advocate.

versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for UPSC.

Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahai, CGSC and Mr.

Sushil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 12.01.2016 After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the present writ petition as main examination in terms of Civil Services Examination Rules, 2015 has been conducted. She states that the petitioner will make a representation as fresh rules for conducting 2016 examinations are yet to be formalised and notified. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It will be open to the petitioner to

make a representation in accordance with law. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on merits.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J.

JANUARY 12, 2016 NA