Rohit Manchanda & ANR v. State & ANR

$~20 to 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. M. A. 955/2018 in W.P.(CRL) 3011/2015 ROHIT MANCHANDA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.

Chander M.

Maini and Mr. Mayank Maini, Advocates.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.), Mr. Piyush Singhal, Adv. for Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State.

+ W.P.(CRL) 401/2017 ROHIT MANCHANDA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.

Chander M.

Maini and Mr. Mayank Maini, Advocates.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Shivani Sharma, Mr. Chaitanya Bansal, Advs. for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC for State.

+ W.P.(CRL) 2623/2017 SUBHASH CHAND MANCHANDA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Chander M.

Maini and Mr. Mayank Maini, Advocates.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Amanpreet Singh,

Advocate for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 06.09.2019 Learned counsel for respondent no.2 seeks time to file rejoinder. He has however pointed out that there is a typographical error in the application. The respondent has inadvertently mentioned himself as petitioner. Learned counsel states that he will carry out the necessary correction and will file amended application.

Since reply will remain the same, rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks from today.

List on 04.03.2020.

BRIJESH SETHI, J SEPTEMBER 06, 2019 ssc