Union Of India And ANR v. Raj Kumar And ORS

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$37&38 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

± W.P.(C)2159/2016 UNION OF iNDIA AND ANR . ... . .Petitioners Through:

Mr. V.S. R. Krishna,Adv.

versus RAJ KUMAR AND ORS Respondents Through:

None.

- + W.P.(C) 2162/2016 UNTON OF INDIA - .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.S. R. Krishna;.Adv.

versus RAM SAROOP & ORS.

Respondents Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

ORDER

% 15.03.2016 CM APPL. 9228/20 16 (For exemption) in W.P.(C) 2159/2016 CM APPL. 9235/2016 (For exemption) in W.P.(C) 2162/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 9229/20 16 (delay in re-filing) in W.P.(C) 2159/2016 CM APPL. 9236/2016 (delay in re-filing) in W.P.(C) 2162/2016 Applications are allowed and delay in re-filing is condoned. Applications stand disposed of. - W.P.(C) 2159/2016 & CM APPL. 9227/2016 (stay)

.4W.P.(C) 2162/2016 & CM APPL. 9234/2016 (stay) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to. file .a review application as it is stated that the impugned order was passed without notice to the petitioner.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. We also grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition impugning the order under challenge, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed in their review application.

SANJI 'ANNA, J NA IWAZIRI,J MARCH 15, 2016/acm -