High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/798/2016

Sadanand Kushwaha v. The Director, Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR

2017-03-22Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Valmiki J. Mehta1 pages

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 798/2016 SADANAND KUSHWAHA ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Monica Kapoor, Advocate.

versus THE DIRECTOR, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. R.K. Gupta, Zone-II, DOE.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 22.03.2017 1.

Learned counsel appears for the petitioner on account of being engaged through Delhi High Court Legal Services Authority, and states that she is not receiving instructions from the petitioner, and therefore, rejoinder affidavit could not be filed. Counsel for the petitioner also states that only oral instructions have been received not to press the writ petition but petitioner has not given the same in writing. 2.

In view of the above, since the petitioner is not prosecuting the petition, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J MARCH 22, 2017 Ne