Tejpal v. Nirmala Wanti (Deceased) Thr Lrs

$~30&31 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RC.REV. 64/2016 TEJPAL Petitioner Through:

None versus NIRMALA WANTI (DECEASED) THR LRS Respondent Through:

None AND + RC.REV. 65/2016 TEJPAL Petitioner Through:

None versus NIRMALA WANTI (DECEASED) THR LRS Respondent Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

ORDER

% 29.05.2017 RC.REV. Nos. 64/2016 & 65/2016 1.

None has appeared on behalf of the parties.

2.

On the last date of hearing, counsel for the respondent submitted that settlement has been taken place between the parties and time has been given to place on record settlement.

3.

Till date settlement has not been placed on record. The counsel for the parties have also preferred not to appear today. RC Rev.Nos.64 & 65 of 2016 By:AMULYA

4.

It appears that after the settlement, the parties are not interested to appear.

5.

The petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. CM No.3754/2016 in RC.REV.64/2016 CM No.3939/2016 in RC.REV.65/2016 Dismissed as infructuous.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 29, 2017 w RC Rev.Nos. 64 & 65 of2016