A.Narayana v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.525 OF 2019 O R D E R :

This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularising the services of the petitioner in any one of the existing last grade category posts as per G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994, from the date of completion of 5 years as per the proposals of the 4th respondent sent to 3rd respondent vide Lr.Roc.No.C1/850/2007, dated 12.12.2007, as illegal, arbitrary and sought for a consequential direction to regularise the services of the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, F&P, dated 22.04.1994 from the date of completion of 5 years in any one of the existing last grade category posts in 4th respondent's municipality as per the proposals of the 4th respondent dated 12.12.2007. Heard Sri P.Raghavender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-III and Sri T.Chandra Shekar Rao, learned Standing counsel for 4th respondent.

It is contended by the petitioner that he was appointed as Public Health Worker in the 3rd respondent's municipality on 15.03.1997. Petitioner further contends that though he is fully eligible and qualified for regularization of services in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 from the date of completion of 5 years, the respondents are not regularising his services. The 4th respondent has also submitted proposals to 3rd respondent vide letter dated 12.12.2007 for regularisation of NMR's services who are working in Bhongiri Municipality, where the name of the petitioner is

figured at Sl.No.32, but the respondents have not passed any orders on the said proposal.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that appropriate orders be issued to the respondents to pass orders on the proposals submitted by 4th respondent in accordance with law. Learned Government Pleader for Services-III contends that since the proposals were pending with the respondents, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate order. Considering the submissions of both the parties, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the proposals submitted by the 4th respondent by duly taking note of the judgments in B.Srinivasulu v. Nellore Municipal Corporation {Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dated 17.08.2015} and W.P.No.33936 of 2011 and batch dated 02.05.2018 and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed in consequence.

_________________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI,J Date: 21.01.2019 dv