Gaddam Anjaiah v. The Chairman And Managing Director
[ 3304 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 378 OF 2019 Between:
Gaddanr Anjaiah, S/o.Ramaiah, Aged about 58 years, Employee code.01154844, Rlo.14-5-14, Parushuram Karimnagar District.
Occ.tVulti Job Worker, Nagar, Godavarikhani, ...PETITIONER AND The Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.
The Director( PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, SCCL, Kothagudem Khammam District.
3. The General [Vanager (Personnel), Welfare Collieries Company Limited, S.CCL Welfare Department, Singareni Bhavani Hyderabad.
4. The Corporate Medical Board, Represented by the Chief lr4edical Officer, Kothagudem Khammam District.
and CSR, The Wing Corporate Singareni Personnel ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order or direction writ or writs more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [r4andamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the circular vide reference No.CRP/PER/lRlClO81l1622, dt.17.1O.2O11, in restricting the age of the Petitioner to refer to the 4th Respondent IVedical Board is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to refer the petitioner to the 4th Respondent, Medical Board is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to refer the Petitioner to the 4th Respondent Medical Board and
declared as unfit for the servrce of the Respondent company as per Mines Act '1952 and its rules 1955, in the interest of justice and equity. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pleased direct the respondent No.4, to conduct IMedical Examination on the health condition of the Petrtioner, pending disposal of the main Writ petition in the intermit of justice and equity.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CH.JANARDHAN REDDY c o u n s e I ro r t h e Re s p o n o'
" t''
?$ ?f [' Ji$E iHi ^[ ?%1"i,, *,., c o. Lr D ) The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.378 0F 2019 ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up For hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she has no instructions from her client and seeking to close the writ petition accordinglY.
2. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed, with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedies as available under law. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSTSTANT RE$lsrJrAR //TRUE COPY/I \^,,,.
V SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI CH.JANARDHAN REDDY, Advocate. IOPUCI
2. One CC to SRI P SRI HARSHA REDDY, (SC FOR SINGARENI coLLTERTES -CO.LTD) IOPUC]
3. Two CD Copies.
BSK GJP o
I HIGH COURT DATED:1 610212024 .C STAf€ l .i r/) iCio 2 3 t{AH 24zr _i t i De'.SPATC,
ORDER
WP.No.378 of 2019 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS rrl"JeT o