Haritha Kurapati v. The State Of Telangana

[ 3304 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 598 OF 2018 Between:

Haritha Kurapati, dlo. Somanadham Kurapati, Aged about 28 yeafti, Occ.Unemployee, R/o.H.No.3-4-515, Flal No.103, Ganapathi Apartments, Near Amrutha Talkies, Hanamkonda, Warangal Urban District Warangal ...PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Horticulture and Sericulture Department, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad

2. The Director of Horticulture, and Sericulture, Public Garden, Nampally, Hyderabad

3. The District Horticulture and Culture Officer (DHSO), H.No.2-5-47, B.K.Reddy Colony, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal Urban District.

4. Smt.Ashwini Mukide, D/o. Srinivas, Occ Horticulture El:tension Officer R/o.Uppalapally , Kamalapur Mandal, Warangal Urban ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constrtution of lnd ia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to declare action of the respondents in appointing the unofficial respondent for the post of Horticulture Extension Officer is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment as Horticulture Extension Officer in view of securing higher marks i.e.8.

87 in the selection process with all consequential benefits lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affrdavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Horticulture Extension Officer forthwith by considering her merit 8 .87 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAM6.VARAP'U RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.598 OF 2018 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner has informed the Court that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2.

In view of the same, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTAbTT REGISTRAR qD SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] ohe cc to SRl. RAVINDER ALKUCHI, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies J B tvl GJP s

HIGH COURT DATED:3011012023 T T S € 1r€ q C) I N ,.) L ,+ * t ( D E F'

?il8

ORDER

WP.No.598 of 2018 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS a \1 'u3 \