Matangi Renuka v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.279 OF 2020 DATED : 07.01.2020 Between :

Matangi Renuka W/o.Late Ashok, Aged about 38 yrs, Occu : Social Worker, R/o.H.No.17-2-70/9, N.T.R.Nagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District, (Erstwhile Karimnagar District), Telangana State.

..... Petitioner And The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

.....Respondents The Court made the following:

- 2 - HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.279 OF 2020 ORDER :

Petitioner contested as Member to Ward No.13 of Ramagundam Municipal Corporation, Peddapalli District, in the elections held in the year 2014. Alleging that petitioner did not file election expenditure, order was passed on 23.06.2017 by the State Election Commission declaring the petitioner as ineligible for three years from the date of issue of that order to contest any election to be held for any Office under the provisions of Telangana Municipalities Act, 1965.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State Election Commission. Learned counsel appearing for State Election Commission agrees that subject matter of the writ petition is covered by the decision of learned single judge of this Court rendered in W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch.

3.

From the reading of the order impugned, it is apparent that no prior notice was issued before passing such order and notice was not issued within reasonable time from the date of conclusion of election process.

4.

In W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch, learned single Judge of this Court considered the issue in detail and held such action of the State Election Commission in disqualifying the candidates on the ground that they did not file election expenditure in the elections held in the year 2014 after long lapse of time as illegal,

- 3 - and amounts to arbitrary exercise of power, and set aside the similar orders passed against the petitioners therein. 5.

Following the earlier orders of this Court, this Writ Petition is also allowed by setting aside the order impugned. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 7th January, 2020 Rds