G.P. Jyothi Grace v. The Telangana State Road Transport

[ 3303 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No. 23391 Between:

G.P. Jyothi 9race,.Wo--Late G.P.P. Kumar (E.207389), Aged about 44 years, Unemployee, R/o. Q. No.46, West MCH Colony, Parsigutta, Secunderabad, Telangana State.

PETITIONER AND I The Telangana Stgte Road Transport, Corporation, Represented by its Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, Telangana Siate. The Regional Manager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Secunderabad Region, JBS, Picket, Secunderabad, Telangana State.' The Depot Manager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Kushaiguda Bus Depot, Secunderabad, Telangana State.

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Direction or an Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner in to suitable post on compassionate appointment under Bread Winner Scheme is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner into any suitable post on compassionate grounds (under breadwinner scheme) in the respondent corporation forthwith and pass such other order or orders this Honble Cou( deems fit and proper.

I l.A. 1 2017(WPMP. 28895 2017) Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ttre High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case ol the petitioner for appointment as per GO.Ms No. 2 TR&B (TR.ll) Dept. dt. 05-01-20'13 on compassionate grounds (under breadwinner scheme) in the responde rt corporation forthwith and pass such other order or orders this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.VENKATESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N.VASUDE\/A REDDY, (SC FOR RTC) The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No. 2339L of 2Ol7 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Venkateshwer Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits pursuant to the interim order granted by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.28895 of 2Ol7 , dated 14.O7 .2017 , the respondents considered the claim of the petitioner and the petitioner name was placed in the waiting list.

2.

Recording the above submission, no further adjudication is required 3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/.C.PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR g SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRI P.VENKATESWAR RAO Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI N.VASUDEVA REDDY, (SC FOR RTC) [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies.

BSK SB \.tt(

HIGH COURT DATED:2510912023 -'!, t\f. STAIE ( .t 1s s$ flB i-) \tq * p,--.- " , ,. .' ,

ORDER

WP.No.23391 of 2017 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS