Jogu Sambaiah v. Kurapati Ravindar
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD Between:
Jogu Sambaiah S/o.Late Lingaiah @Rajalingam, Aged 67 years, Occ: Agriculture/Business, R/o.H.No.18-1-110, Subashnagar, Ursu, Warangal, Warangal district.
...
Petitioner And Kurapati Ravindar S/o.Late Kurapati Lingaiah Aged about 35 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/o.H.No.23-18-42, 3rd Street, Lalithanagar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari district and 11 others ...
Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mrs. K.Tulasi Durgamba for Mr.Kowturu Vinaya Kumar Counsel for the Respondents : Mr.Avinash Desai for R1 to R4 and R6 to R8 None appeared for R9 to 11 Mr.J.Anil Kumar Standing Counsel for Legal Services Authority for R12 The Court made the following:
Order: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: "to issue writ or direction, preferably writ of certiorari and call for the record pertaining to award in O.S.No.4 of 2009 dated 04.06.2009 and order passed in PLC.No.793 of 2013 dated 24.07.2013 passed by the Hon'ble District Legal Services Authority, Warangal and quash the same". 2.
On 21.06.2018, we have adjourned the case to today, to enable the counsel for the sole petitioner to bring on record, his legal representatives, as he was stated to have died in the year 2016. As the legal representatives of the petitioner have not come on record for nearly 2 years, we have granted a week's time for doing the needful, with the rider that by the next date of hearing, if the application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased writ petitioners is not filed, the writ petition will automatically stand dismissed.
3.
Today at the hearing, the learned counsel representing Mr.Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, submitted that no one has approached them for filing the application for bringing them on record as legal representatives of the deceased sole writ petitioner. 4.
In the light of the above order dated 21.06.2018, the writ petition automatically stood dismissed as abated. 5.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the writ petition, interim order dated 12.09.2013 shall stand vacated and accordingly, I.A.No.1 of
2014 (WVMP.No.148 of 2014) is allowed and I.A.No.1 of 2013 (W.P.M.P.No.32820 of 2013) stands dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (Gudiseva Shyam Prasad,J) Date: 28th June, 2018 msb