K.Venkateswara Rao, Medak District v. The Hon`Ble Labour Court-Ii, Hyderabad And Another

[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 3766 OF 2008 Between:

K.Venkateswara Rao, K.P.Subbarayady, Aged about 50 years , R/o.41-49, Phase-l IDA Nethaji Nagar. Patancheru Medak District ...PETITIONER AND 1 . The Hon'ble Labour Court- ll, Hyderabad , Rep by its Presiding Officer

2. Ventra Locomotives Limited, Ploi No.23-B IDA Patancheru, Medak District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and after calling for the records in MP.No.20l2004 dated 28.12.2007 on the file of the Hon'ble 1"t respondent in dismissing the claim of the petitioner as the same is illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently set aside the order in MP.No.20l2004 dated 28.12.2007 to pay an amount of Rs.5,77,5161 to the petitioner l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 10957 OF 2009) Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed. in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to take up out of turn of final hearing of the writ petition

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to take up out of turn of final hearing of the writ petition l.A. ilO: 1 OF 2012(WPMp. NO: 2S72s OF 2012) Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to take up out of turn of final hearing of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Gp FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V. S. SOMAYAJULU The Court made the following: ORDER

,:.,., . . THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAG}ESH BI{EEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.3766 of 2OO8 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the said submission, this writ petition 1S dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, sha-ll stand closed.

\ SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC ION OFFICER To,i $: 33J?"'3i F"HX$?H,[i#t:ffil"JP'[33]t't" ot r"r'ns ana at . g*"8ttS l8''J. ..MAYAJ'LU' Advocate toPUCl

4. Two CD CoPies BM GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:2610712024 I S { ( I ,.) n 2o L OITDER ?

L pn t:

WP.No.3766 of 2008 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS f* >1 II 1@,rb