Karre Venkataiah v. The State Of Telangana
[ 3183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 573 OF 2023 Between:
Karre Venkataiah, S/o. K.Ramaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ- Agriculture, Ri/o. Medipally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, .Secretariat, Hyderabad.
)
2. The District Collector, Medchal Malkajgiri District.
3. The Tahsildar, Medipally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.
4. Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Represented by its Metropolitan Commissioner, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased t issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in obstructing the Petitioner to carry out the agricultural operations in respect of the Agricultural land to an extent of Ac.3.00 guntas, in Sy.No. 62, of Medipally Village, Medchal Malkajgiri District, damaging the crops with JCB's by levelling the land and consequently direct the respondents to issue pattas to the Petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents nol to interfere / dispossess the petitioner from his agricultural land in Sy.No.62 of [Vledipally Village, Medchal Malkajgiri District to an extent of Ac. 3.00, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRl. V. NARASIMHA GOUD The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITIO N No.573 ol 2023 ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dated 15.06.2023 to the Registry stating the petitioner herein compromised the matter with the respondents and as such, intends to withdraw the writ petition. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT-REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I 1D SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri. Thadikonda Koteshwara Prasad, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to V. Narasimha Goud, SC for HMDA[OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTJ
4. Two CD Copies TJ t cJFd\^-/
HIGH COURT DATED:2010612023 ,.{, o ';, .,\ '-) i I c ) -( 11 '\\L NB OREiER WP.No.573 o12023 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
N- -P )4