G Subhakar, v. Prl.Secy., School Education,
3The Hon'ble Sri Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Hon'ble Sri Justice M. GANGA RAO + WRIT PETITION No.369 OF 2018 % Date:05.01.2018 Between:
# G. Subhakar S/ o.G. Sudershan Rao, 46 years, School Assistant (Social Studies) Government UP School, Tajangi, Chinthapalli Mandal, Visakhaptam District, Andhra Pradesh. ... Petitioner Vs.
$ The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District and others. ... Respondents ! Counsel for Petitioner : Sri M. Srikanth ^ Counsel for Respondents : G.P. for Services (AP) < Gist :
> Head Note :
? Cases Referred : Nil
VRS,J & MGR,J WP No.369 of 2018 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO WRIT PETITION No.369 OF 2018 ORDER: (per V. Ramasubramanian, J) Aggrieved by the dismissal of his original application by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, the petitioner, who is working as a School Assistant (Social Studies), has come up with the above writ petition.
2. Heard Mr. M. Srikanth, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that at the time of transfer counselling, he ought to have been considered as a person working in category-IV School and awarded points accordingly for considering his case for allotment to another School. But the respondents considered him to be working in a category-III School, thereby depriving him of the points that he is entitled.
4. The Tribunal dismissed the Original Application forcing the petitioner to come up with the above writ petition.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner brought to our attention to a set of Rules known as Andhra Pradesh Teachers (Regulation of Transfers) Rules issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.31 School Education dated 31.05.2017, in which there is a provision under Rule 21 for filing a appeal. Therefore, learned counsel sought permission to file an appeal in respect of his grievance. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file an appeal in terms of the aforesaid Rules. Upon such appeal being filed, the appellate Authority
VRS,J & MGR,J WP No.369 of 2018 may consider the same with reference to the Rules, and on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
6. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J _______________ M. GANGA RAO, J January 05, 2018 KTL